Main Points
Men don’t lose themselves dramatically; they lose themselves gradually.
The buried life forms when responsibilities multiply, emotional expression narrows, and identity gets shaped more by roles and expectations than by authenticity.
The buried life of men is not failure — it is an adaptation. But it carries a cost: loss of clarity, direction, presence, and internal coherence.
Reclaiming an unburied life requires honesty, practical steps, and a willingness to challenge internal narratives that once felt necessary for survival.
What Men Bury Internally — And Why Identity Loss Matters
Most men carry an inner world that rarely surfaces. It includes unspoken desires driven by self-consciousness, interests set aside to be responsible, and private daydreams of a life more aligned with who they truly are than the one they currently lead. These parts of a man don’t disappear; they become buried under years of duty, pressure, and performance.
The buried life of men refers to the parts of identity that remain intact but unexpressed:
- preferences pushed aside because they felt impractical
- desires suppressed because they didn’t fit expectations
- truths avoided because they risked conflict
- questions left unasked because stability seemed fragile
Most men do not realise they are burying themselves while it’s happening. It unfolds slowly — through choices that feel sensible, responsible, even admirable.
Moments of recognition appear quietly: driving home after work, sitting in early morning stillness, pausing between tasks. The thought emerges:
“How did I end up living this version of myself — and where did the rest of me go?”
Matthew Arnold captured a similar pattern in his 1852 poem The Buried Life, describing the tension between the outward life people show and the inner life they rarely speak of. He was not writing psychology, yet he observed what we now understand through research: internal worlds go underground when expression feels unsafe, inconvenient, or incompatible with expectation.
Today, the tension Arnold described is heightened by cultural pressures on men to stay productive, emotionally controlled, and consistently dependable. The divide between their outer life and inner life grows until the man realises he is performing, not inhabiting, his own identity.
“Men don’t hide their inner world because it is weak. They hide it because they believe exposure carries risk.”
What the Buried Life Is: Early Signs Men Are Losing Themselves
To understand the buried life, we must examine three early mechanisms:
- Emotional narrowing
- Functional presence without internal engagement
- Identity drift disguised as responsibility
Each forms gradually. Each feels logical in the moment. Yet each quietly removes a man from himself.
Emotional Narrowing in Men — How Internal Signals Begin to Shut Down
Men rarely shut down emotionally on purpose. Instead, they gradually narrow their emotional bandwidth in response to repeated cues across childhood, adolescence, and adulthood.
How Emotional Narrowing Begins
Boys absorb messages through behaviour, not instruction:
- Big feelings often trigger discomfort in adults who react negatively
- Distress is redirected (“You’re fine — don’t worry about it”)
- Competence is praised more than emotional accuracy
- Responsibility arrives earlier and more consistently for boys than girls
These repeated patterns create developmental alexithymia — difficulty noticing, naming, or interpreting internal states.
By adolescence, many boys have already learned that expressing internal truth leads to embarrassment, rejection, or minimisation. By adulthood, emotional narrowing feels normal.
Numbing Is Not Emptiness — It’s Overload Reduction
Men often misinterpret reduced emotion as emptiness or indifference. But emotional numbing is usually a protective mechanism produced by:
- chronic stress
- increased cortisol
- long-term over-functioning
- responsibility without relief
- suppressed desire
- unresolved fear
The nervous system reduces intensity so the man can continue operating.
This is not emotional absence — it is emotional survival.
Loss of Presence in Men — Functioning Externally While Disconnected Internally
Presence is a man’s ability to bring his internal world into the moment — attention, awareness, engagement, and responsiveness. It is not emotional intensity, nor is it performative openness. It simply means he is internally available, not just physically present.
When men suppress emotions, desires, or the truth, staying present becomes difficult. Men can be in the room but feel disconnected from what is happening. They hear conversations but struggle to grasp their meaning. They take part in family routines while remaining internally absent.
This absence is not negligence. It results from the emotional narrowing they have undergone.
The Cost of Losing Presence
When presence fades, men often experience:
- irritability
- detachment
- difficulty concentrating
- reduced empathy
- a sense of going through the motions
Others around them notice the absence too — partners feel emotionally distant, children detect unpredictability, and colleagues experience less engagement.
“A man can perform every role expected of him and still feel missing from his own life.”
Reflective Question
Where in your life do you show up physically but remain internally unavailable?
Identity Drift in Men — When Responsibility Overtakes Authenticity
Identity erosion does not happen dramatically. It occurs through incremental trade-offs:
- an interest set aside for a role
- a truth swallowed to avoid conflict
- a desire suppressed because it felt impractical
- a boundary avoided because it seemed inconvenient
Eventually, the man realises he has built a life that made sense to everyone but him.

Identity drift occurs when:
- external expectations define direction
- roles become more familiar than desires
- responsibility replaces choice
- survival strategies outlive their usefulness
Why Men Don’t Notice the Drift
Men often mistake stability for alignment. Stability signals that the structures of life are intact — the job, the home, the relationship, the routine. But alignment is different: it is the match between a man’s external life and his internal world.
It’s whether his actions fit his values, whether his direction reflects what matters to him, and whether he recognises himself inside the life he’s living. A life can be stable yet completely misaligned. If nothing is collapsing, a man may assume nothing is wrong.
But stability without authenticity is maintenance, not meaning.
Early Signs of Identity Drift
Identity drift doesn’t announce itself loudly. It shows up in small, persistent signals that something in a man’s outer life no longer matches his internal world. These signs are often easy to dismiss, yet they point to a subtle misalignment between who he is and how he lives.
- feeling “off” without knowing why
- losing interest in things that once mattered
- feeling like life is happening rather than being chosen
- persistent thought: “There should be more to this.”
Early Questions Men Ask When They Sense the Buried Life
How do I know if I’m living the buried life?
You feel functional but disconnected. Capable but unclear. Present but not engaged.
Why do these signs appear slowly, not suddenly?
Because the buried life develops through adaptive choices — not crises.
Is it normal to feel ashamed for having thoughts or desires that don’t match my role?
Yes — but that shame is misplaced. Most men assume their inner world makes them different; in reality, their internal lives are far more normal than they believe.
Can the buried life be reversed?
Yes. But it begins with recognition, not reinvention.
How the Buried Life Forms: The Mechanisms Behind Male Identity Drift
Men don’t bury themselves suddenly.
They bury themselves gradually — through a series of adaptations that made sense at the time.
Each adaptation helps a boy survive, a young man succeed, and a grown man function.
But over the years, these same adaptations expose a man to the risk of losing his inner world.
This section explains how the buried life forms, not through pathology, but through predictable pressures that shape men’s psychological development.
Masculine Conditioning — How Boys Learn to Disconnect from Themselves
Masculine conditioning begins early and becomes invisible by adulthood. Boys receive thousands of subtle signals about which parts of themselves are welcome and which parts disrupt expectations.
They learn through experience that:
- Big feelings make adults uncomfortable
- Emotional honesty is redirected or shut down
- Achievement brings approval
- Independence is praised earlier for boys than for girls
- Responsibility earns respect
- Vulnerability can invite ridicule
These patterns create a template for adulthood:
“If I stay in control, I’m acceptable. If I expose too much, I become a problem.”
By adolescence, emotional expression is already narrowed.
By adulthood, the man suppresses without noticing, often continuing unresolved emotional patterns inherited from his father.
He functions, performs, and provides — and the inner life becomes optional.
Why This Matters
Masculine conditioning isn’t harmful in itself.
What harms men is that it becomes the only mode available, limiting emotional literacy, reducing internal awareness, and shaping identity around functionality rather than authenticity.
“A man rarely chooses suppression; he adapts to environments that reward it.”
Shame in Men — The Hidden Force That Makes Internal Life Feel Dangerous
Men rarely feel shame for having an internal world. They feel shame for the internal world they actually have.
Because most men never speak openly about desire, fear, confusion, or dissatisfaction, they assume:
- “Other men don’t feel this.”
- “If I say this out loud, I’ll be seen differently.”
- “Real men don’t think this way.”
- “Something is wrong with me.”
Shame then mislabels natural human needs as personal flaws.
Shame tells men:
- your desires are unreasonable
- your doubts are signs of weakness
- your dreams are irresponsible
- your fear means you’re failing
- your emotional needs make you different from others
This creates a private sense of deficiency that drives suppression more effectively than any external message.
Why Shame Is So Powerful for Men?
Shame isolates.
A man carries an internal world he believes no one else would understand — when in reality, other men share far more of his private experience than he realises.
Shame doesn’t just mute expression.
It convinces a man that silence is protective.
Reflective Question
What part of your inner world have you assumed makes you different from other men?
Fear in Men — How Responsibility Creates Suppression
Fear in men is rarely dramatic. It is quiet, practical, and deeply tied to responsibility.
Men fear:
- disappointing partners or children
- destabilising family systems
- financial consequences
- losing control
- exposing desire they can’t justify
- admitting uncertainty
- appearing unreliable
- risking a change that affects others
This is structural fear, not emotional fear. It is tied to duty, expectations, and survival.
Fear becomes the lens through which men evaluate all internal truth:
- “If I say this, will I hurt someone?”
- “If I want this, will it cause conflict?”
- “If I change, does everything else collapse?”
Over time, fear shapes identity more than desire does.
The safest life becomes the one where the man keeps himself buried.
“Men don’t stay silent because they’re fragile. They stay silent because they believe speaking will cost too much.”
Workplace Pressures — Why Professional Expectations Deepen Emotional Containment in Men
For many men, workplaces are the strongest reinforcer of emotional suppression.
Across industries, men learn that professionalism means:
- composure under pressure
- reliability regardless of internal state
- minimal emotional expression
- avoiding anything that appears unstable
A man who expresses uncertainty may be seen as uncommitted.
A man who shows emotional weight may be considered less capable.
A man who asks for relief risks being repositioned as someone who needs management.
Because of this, men split their identity:
- the functional self they show at work
- the internal self that becomes quieter each year
They maintain performance even when their internal world is crowded. This efficiency becomes part of their identity — but at the cost of presence, clarity, and emotional capacity.
Reflective Question
Where did you learn that expressing internal truth made you professionally unsafe?
Family Roles — How Responsibility Leads Men to Suppress Their Inner World
In family systems, men often suppress their inner worlds because they feel responsible for maintaining stability.
They tell themselves:
- “I can’t afford to fall apart.”
- “My family needs consistency.”
- “If I change, others will feel it.”
- “I should carry this quietly.”
This internal narrative reinforces emotional silence. The family does not impose it; the man assumes it.
Partners may interpret a man’s steadiness as reliability, and he interprets their response as confirmation that he must remain unchanged. But steadiness can become confinement when it limits a man’s ability to express internal truth.
Why Family Systems Reinforce Suppression
Families subconsciously adapt to the man’s role, he:
- provides structure
- absorbs pressure
- avoids disruption
- maintains predictability
When he begins to feel the buried life, he worries any shift may unsettle those who depend on him. So he doubles down — even as the internal cost grows.
Reflective Question
How much do you suppress because you believe your internal truth might unsettle others?
Male Friendships — Why Men Connect Without Emotional Exposure
Men often have friendships based on shared activity, humour, projects, fitness, or problem-solving. These bonds are meaningful — but they lack emotional disclosure.
Men rarely discuss:
- dissatisfaction
- doubt
- private fears
- regret
- desire
- identity loss
Because none of their male peers speak openly, men assume:
- they are the only ones feeling this way
- emotional honesty is unusual
- disclosure would break the unspoken rules of male connection
This absence of exposure reinforces the belief that emotional truth is unwelcome or risky.
In reality, men often avoid vulnerability because no one else is modelling it.
Economic Duty — How Financial Responsibility Shapes Male Identity
Economic responsibility shapes a man more than he realises.
He internalises the belief that:
- he must provide
- he must not falter
- he must maintain stability
- his income equals his reliability
- his family’s well-being depends on his capacity
These beliefs become so ingrained that any adjustment feels dangerous.
Economic stability becomes restrictive when a man believes he cannot alter his workload, pace, career direction, or expectations without causing financial or relational consequences.
He suppresses dissatisfaction because he sees responsibility as non-negotiable.
The buried life deepens in proportion to the weight he carries.
“Responsibility is essential. But when it replaces identity, a man slowly disappears from his own life.”
Cultural Norms — How Society Teaches Men to Contain Their Emotions
Social messages still teach men that:
- competence is masculine
- emotional restraint is respectable
- strength means self-management
- control equals value
- desire must be justified
The media portrays men who absorb strain without breaking, grieve without exposure, and lead without hesitation.
These narratives become silent comparison points. Men internalise them not as stories about fictional characters but as unspoken rules about how real men should operate. They absorb the message that reliability means emotional containment, that competence requires self-management, and that strength is measured by how little they need.
Over time, these expectations shift from external images to internal standards, shaping how men judge their own capacity, performance, and emotional lives.
This reinforces two harmful assumptions:
- Other men cope better.
- My internal world is the problem — not the pressure I’m under.
These beliefs keep men buried long after the external need for suppression has passed.
Why do men suppress so much without realising it?
Because suppression feels adaptive, responsible, and professionally safer.
Why is this pattern more common in men than in women?
Boys receive different emotional cues, experience more pressure to perform, and learn early to avoid relational disruption.
What prevents men from challenging these patterns earlier
Fear of consequences, shame about internal truth, role expectations, and lack of models for safe emotional disclosure.
Does every man experience the buried life?
Not all, but many men experience elements of it without having the language to name what they’re carrying.
The Cost of the Buried Life on Men’s Clarity, Presence, and Direction
Men often sense the buried life long before they can articulate it. The feeling is similar to what I’ve called the grief of an unlived life — the ache that comes from realising parts of the self have been postponed or abandoned. They know something isn’t aligning, but they don’t yet have the language for what is shifting inside them.
They know something isn’t aligning — but they don’t yet have the language for what is shifting inside them. The cost of the buried life emerges gradually, in ways that are easy to rationalise and difficult to confront.
This section clarifies the cost and offers a grounded, realistic way for men to begin returning to themselves.
The Five Ways Men Lose Themselves Through the Buried Life
The buried life costs a man five core capacities.
1. Men lose clarity
When a man suppresses desire for long periods, he loses access to the very signals that inform direction and meaning. Clarity fades because the man is no longer listening to the part of himself that knows what he wants.
He becomes efficient but uncertain.
Capable but directionless.
Functional but internally muted.
Clarity requires access to desire. Without that access, decisions become reactive rather than intentional.
Reflective Question
Where have you mistaken emotional numbness for clarity?
2. Men lose presence
Presence is a man’s internal availability — the ability to bring his attention, awareness, and engagement into the moment.
When emotional suppression becomes habitual, presence collapses.
He shows up physically but remains internally removed.
He participates in routines while feeling detached from them.
He listens without absorbing.

This is emotional bandwidth overload, not apathy.
Reflective Question
Where in your life do you feel like a participant in action but an observer internally?
3. Men lose relational depth
Partners and children sense disconnection even before the man can name it.
They feel:
- a shift in the energy he brings
- reduced engagement
- emotional absence
- difficulty accessing him
Relationships flatten not because he loves less, but because his internal world is harder for him to access — and therefore harder to share.
Relational depth requires internal presence.
Without it, bonds become functional, not formative.
4. Men lose direction
When internal signals fade, men default to external maps:
- career expectations
- family needs
- cultural norms
- productivity standards
Direction becomes something inherited rather than chosen.
Over time, the man realises the life he built made sense to everyone else but him.
“Men don’t lose direction because they lack ambition.
They lose it because they can no longer hear their internal coordinates.”
5. Men lose themselves quietly
Self-loss happens through incremental self-abandonment:
- minimising preferences
- suppressing needs
- avoiding conflict
- prioritising stability over authenticity
- accepting roles instead of choosing them
Years pass.
The man wakes one morning and does not recognise the life he is living.
This recognition is not failure — it is the beginning of a return
How Men Reclaim Themselves: The Path Back from the Buried Life

The unburied life does not emerge all at once.
Men come back to themselves through small truths, honest acknowledgements, and practical steps that rebuild internal coherence.
Returning is not reinvention. It is reclamation.
Below are the core processes men move through — not as a formula, but as a lived pattern observed across mentoring, psychology, and lived experience.
- The First Disruption — When Something Breaks the Surface
Men rarely seek change without a disruptor, a theme explored further in Post-Traumatic Growth in Men – Rebuilding After Sudden or Traumatic Loss.
It may be:
- grief
- burnout
- relationship strain
- career fatigue
- existential restlessness
- a moment of honesty, they didn’t plan
- or simply the accumulation of quiet dissatisfaction
This disruption can reveal the buried life.
The man begins to sense:
- “I’ve drifted.”
- “I’m not inside my own life.”
- “I don’t know what I want anymore.”
Awareness is the first act of courage.
- Naming the Internal Truth — Without Justification
Men often believe they must justify their internal experiences.
But truth naming is not justification. It is clarity.
Men begin to return when they can say, without explanation:
- “I’m exhausted.”
- “I feel disconnected.”
- “I want something different.”
- “I don’t know who I am inside my roles.”
Naming truth stabilises internal ground.
It returns a man’s attention to the part of him that has been waiting to be heard.
- Making Space for Desire — Even Before Taking Action
Desire is not indulgence.
Desire is direction.
But to many men, the word “desire” only conjures images of sexual longing or impulse. That is the narrow version of desire men have been allowed to name.
In reality, desire is far broader and far more foundational: it is the internal signal that tells a man what energises him, what interests him, what matters, and what he wants to move toward.
Desire includes:
- the pull toward something meaningful
- the curiosity that won’t disappear
- the activities that bring internal nourishment
- the work that feels purposeful
- the relationships that feel genuine
- the life rhythms that fit rather than strain
- the direction that quietly feels right
Men lose themselves when they stop listening to these signals. They reclaim themselves when they allow desire to re-enter the conversation.
Desire is not indulgence — it is orientation.
It gives a man information about where he feels most alive, most true, and most connected to himself. Without access to desire, direction collapses, and identity defaults to obligation.
Reclaiming desire does not mean impulsively chasing whatever feels good.
It means allowing internal truth to inform choices again.
“Desire is not a threat to responsibility. It is a compass for authenticity.”
When men make space for desire — even before taking action — they begin rebuilding the internal coordinates that guide alignment.
- Correcting the Internal Story
The buried life is sustained by internal narratives that men rarely challenge:
- “My needs are disruptive.”
- “If I change, everything falls apart.”
- “I’m the only one who feels this way.”
- “Wanting more is a sign of failure.”
Returning requires changing and correcting the narrative.
A man begins to rebuild when he realises:
- responsibility does not require self-erasure
- emotional truth is not instability
- wanting more is not betrayal
- change can be negotiated, not inflicted
Internal truth strengthens identity; it doesn’t weaken it.
- Taking Small Brave Actions
The unburied life emerges through action, not theory.
Examples include:
- adjusting workload
- setting a boundary
- speaking honestly with a partner
- carving out time for personal interests
- reducing commitments
- asking for support
- making one decision based on authenticity rather than obligation
Small changes accumulate into momentum.
A man does not reclaim himself overnight; he reclaims himself through consistency, not intensity.
- Rebuilding Identity from the Inside Out
As men reconnect with desire, clarity, truth, and presence, identity becomes internally led rather than externally defined.
This is not reinvention.
It is alignment.
Aligned identity emerges when:
- actions match values
- choices match desire
- direction matches internal resonance
- relationships match honesty
- external life reflects internal truth
This is where the unburied life becomes sustainable — not dramatic change, but congruent living.
Questions Men Ask When They Begin to Return
Do I need to make major life changes to unbury myself?
No. Small, consistent adjustments have more impact than dramatic reinvention.
What if my buried life has lasted for decades?
Duration does not reduce the possibility. Men return to themselves at every age and stage.
How do I talk about this without destabilising others?
You begin by naming truth gently, not announcing decisions. Clarity first, action later.
What if I don’t know what I want?
Desire returns as emotional bandwidth expands. It emerges gradually.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- The buried life forms through adaptive patterns — not failure.
- Men suppress themselves gradually through conditioning, responsibility, shame, and fear.
- The cost is clarity, presence, relational depth, direction, and self-recognition.
- The return begins with disruption, truth-naming, desire, narrative correction, and small, brave actions.
- Men don’t reinvent themselves; they return to themselves.
- The unburied life is a life lived from internal coherence, not external expectation.
Recommended Reading
If you would like to read more
- Male Grief in Australia: How Men Reclaim Themselves
- Navigating Male Grief: A Guide
- Why Men Struggle with Uncertainty: The Hidden Cost
- Why Men Compromise Authenticity: The Hidden Cost
FAQ
Why is the buried life so common among men?
The buried life forms easily because masculine socialisation prioritises performance, responsibility, and self-management over internal awareness. Boys learn early to minimise emotion, reduce need, and stay contained. By adulthood, many men have built lives around meeting expectations rather than expressing identity. They didn’t choose to bury themselves — they adapted to environments that rewarded suppression and reliability.
Can men unbury themselves without destabilising their relationships?
Yes. Men do not need to disrupt their families or partnerships to return to themselves. What strengthens relationships is clarity, not chaos. When a man begins by naming what he is noticing internally — without blame, defensiveness, or impulsive action — partners usually feel more connected, not threatened. The risk comes from sudden, unexplained shifts, not from honest self-exploration communicated with steadiness.
Is emotional expression required to reclaim the unburied life?
Not in the dramatic sense many men fear. Reclaiming the unburied life is not about emoting; it is about accuracy. Men need enough emotional awareness to recognise what they feel and why it matters. Expression is helpful, but congruence is essential. A man can be emotionally contained yet internally honest — and that honesty is what rebuilds identity.
What if I fear disappointing people?
Fear of disappointing others is one of the strongest forces maintaining the buried life. Men often assume that honesty will destabilise the people they care about. In reality, people respond more to clarity than perfection. Naming internal truth with steadiness — not apology or volatility — reduces the burden of secrecy and allows relationships to adjust gradually. Fear doesn’t disappear; it becomes manageable when truth is spoken.
How do I know the difference between normal dissatisfaction and genuine identity drift?
Dissatisfaction is usually tied to circumstances — a job, a routine, a particular stressor. Identity drift is persistent and internal. It follows a man across roles and environments and is accompanied by a subtle sense of not recognising himself. If the feeling persists even as external factors improve, it’s a sign the issue lies in internal alignment, not temporary frustration.
What if my partner doesn’t understand why I’m questioning myself?
Partners often react to the uncertainty, not the content. When a man approaches this process with secrecy or urgency, it triggers insecurity in the relationship. When he approaches it with honesty, calm, and no premature decisions, it creates room for understanding. The goal isn’t to convince the partner immediately — it’s to help them see what is shifting inside you, not what you intend to change around them.
Is the buried life the same as depression?
No, although they can overlap. Depression affects mood, energy, and physiological functioning. The buried life affects identity, direction, and internal coherence. A man can feel capable and outwardly functional while still living a buried life. Recognising the distinction helps men understand that not all disconnection is illness; sometimes it is the natural consequence of long-term self-suppression.
What if I’ve spent years — or decades — living the buried life? Is it too late to return?
It is never too late. Men reclaim themselves at 30, 50, 70, and beyond. The length of the drift does not diminish the possibility of return. What matters is the willingness to be honest now. Identity reconstruction is not about restarting life — it is about re-aligning the life you already have with who you actually are. A man can come back to himself at any age when he stops treating his internal world as optional.
About the Author
David Kernohan is the founder of Mentoring Through the Maze, a Perth-based mentoring practice for men navigating grief, identity loss, and disconnection from self.
His work is shaped by more than 30 years in mental health and community leadership — and by his own lived experience of loss, including the death of his son, Matthew, and divorce after a long marriage. Those experiences changed how he understands strength, resilience, and what it means for men to rebuild life from the inside out.
David now mentors men who are finding their footing again after grief, transition, or personal collapse — guiding them to reclaim authenticity, clarity, and grounded courage.
REFERENCES
Arnold, M. (1852). The buried life. In Poems. London: Edward Moxon.
Barker, G., Ricardo, C., & Nascimento, M. (2018). Engaging men and boys in changing gender-based inequity in health: Evidence from programme interventions. World Health Organisation. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5817048/
Brett, J. D., Zarei, M., Preece, D. A., Becerra, R., Gross, J. J., & Mazidi, M. (2025). How alexithymia increases mental health symptoms in adolescence: Longitudinal evidence for the mediating role of emotion regulation. Affective Science, 6(3), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-025-00318-9
Fraley, R. C. (2024). A brief overview of adult attachment theory and research. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. https://labs.psychology.illinois.edu/~rcfraley/attachment.htm
Gebhard, K. T., Cattaneo, L. B., Tangney, J. P., Hargrove, S., & Shor, R. (2019). Threatened-masculinity shame-related responses among straight men: Measurement and relationship to aggression. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 20(3), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000177
Levant, R. F. (1992). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(3–4), 379–402.
Lewandowski, K. E., Whitton, S. W., & Cohn, A. (2020). Attachment, emotion regulation, and well-being in couples: Intrapersonal and interpersonal associations. Personal Relationships, 27(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12320
Mahalik, J. R., Good, G. E., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2023). Masculinity scripts and men’s mental health. American Psychologist.
Real, T. (1997). I don’t want to talk about it: Overcoming the secret legacy of male depression. Scribner.
Seidler, V. (2007). Masculinities, bodies, and emotional life. Palgrave Macmillan.
Triemstra, J. D., Nice, D. S., Peer, S. O., Christian-Brandt, A., Diala, C., & Rhoton, J. (2024). A qualitative analysis of beliefs about masculinity and gender socialization among US mothers and fathers of school-age boys. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 25(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000455
Van Ryzin, M. J., Dishion, T. J., Fosco, G. M., & Pelham, W. E. (2016). The socialization of boys and men in the modern era: An evolutionary mismatch. Prevention Science, 17(8), 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0693-9
Wong, Y. J., & Wester, S. R. (2016). Shame and the masculine self. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(2), 88–99.
15 Responses